Recursive Borrowing Explained: Amplify Yields, Manage Risk (2026)

Recursive Borrowing: The 30-Second Explanation

Recursive Borrowing is a DeFi strategy where you repeatedly supply an asset as collateral, borrow against it, and then supply the borrowed asset again as new collateral—effectively creating a leveraged, self-amplifying loop to boost your yield on a single asset or pair of correlated assets.

Quick example: Imagine depositing Ether (ETH) on a lending platform like Aave, borrowing more ETH against your initial deposit, and immediately depositing that borrowed ETH back into the same platform. Repeating this process several times amplifies your exposure to the asset and, critically, the yield you earn on your supplied capital.

How Recursive Borrowing Actually Works

At its core, recursive borrowing, often simply called "looping," is one of the oldest yet most powerful strategies in decentralized finance for efficient yield amplification. It leverages the inherent mechanics of overcollateralized lending protocols like Aave and Compound. The process relies on self-executing smart contracts that handle all lending and borrowing operations, removing intermediaries and enabling this iterative process. Lending protocols alone account for over $50 billion in total value locked (TVL) across DeFi, illustrating their critical role in the ecosystem. This strategy's goal is to turn a modest base yield, say 5% on a deposited asset, into a significantly higher effective yield, potentially 12% or even 15%, by increasing your total capital actively earning yield.

Here’s a step-by-step breakdown:

1. Initial Deposit: You start by depositing an asset (e.g., stETH, USDC, ETH) into a lending protocol as collateral. This deposit immediately begins earning a supply interest rate.
2. First Borrow: Based on the protocol's Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratio for your collateral, you borrow a certain percentage of its value. For an stETH loop, you'd typically borrow ETH or a stablecoin. For a stablecoin loop, you'd borrow more of that same stablecoin.
3. Recycle: You then re-deposit the borrowed asset back into the same protocol as new collateral. This is the "recursive" part of the strategy.
4. Repeat: You repeat steps 2 and 3 multiple times. Each time you re-deposit, you increase your total supplied collateral, which in turn increases your borrowing power and, consequently, the amount of yield-earning capital in the loop.

The magic happens because you're earning supply interest on a much larger principal than your initial investment, offset by the borrow interest paid. This amplification works best when the supply APY significantly outweighs the borrow APY for the asset pair, or when there are attractive liquidity mining incentives supplementing the base rates.

Key Components of Your Recursive Yield

Understanding recursive borrowing isn't just about the steps; it's about the variables that dictate your profitability and risk profile. These are the core components that interact within any leveraged looping strategy:

• Supply APY: This is the annual percentage yield you earn on the assets you supply to the lending protocol. The higher, the better for your overall strategy.
• Borrow APY: Conversely, this is the annual percentage yield you pay on the assets you borrow. You want this to be as low as possible, ideally lower than your supply APY for a positive yield spread.
• Loan-to-Value (LTV): The maximum percentage of your collateral's value you can borrow. A higher LTV allows for more aggressive looping, but also elevates risk. For example, Aave V3's E-Mode can provide very high LTVs for highly correlated assets like stETH/ETH.
• Liquidation Threshold: This is the collateralization ratio below which your position becomes eligible for liquidation. It’s always higher than the LTV to provide a safety buffer.
• Health Factor: A numerical representation of your position's safety. A health factor of 1.0 means you are at the liquidation threshold. A higher number indicates a safer position.
• Friction Costs: These are the practical costs of executing the loop. They primarily include network transaction fees (gas), especially on Ethereum where gas can hit $50+ during congestion, and potential slippage if you're swapping assets within the loop. As one expert noted, in recursive borrowing, time is often the only real protection against these friction costs, as constant rebalancing can eat into profits.
• Incentives: Many protocols offer additional token rewards (e.g., COMP from Compound, or ARB tokens through programs like Arbitrum's DRIP) to users who supply or borrow. These can significantly boost the overall effective APY of a recursive strategy.

Why Recursive Borrowing Matters for Your Portfolio

Recursive borrowing represents a powerful mechanism for capital efficiency and yield optimization in DeFi. With markets largely sideways, as they are now with market sentiment trending neutral, maximizing capital efficiency has become a central theme for many sophisticated investors. This strategy allows you to put your capital to work harder, generating amplified returns on assets you might already be holding or staking.

As of this writing, crypto borrowing demand shows early signs of recovery, though still well below 2025 peaks. This indicates a growing appetite for leverage and yield opportunities, making strategies like recursive borrowing relevant once again. By understanding how to safely implement these loops, you can potentially outpace standard 'hodling' returns or simple single-asset staking.

When Recursive Borrowing Goes Wrong

While attractive, the leveraged nature of recursive borrowing carries significant risks. The primary danger is liquidation. When the value of your collateral drops significantly, or if borrow interest rates spike unexpectedly, your position's health factor can fall below 1.0. At that point, a liquidator can repay a portion of your loan, seizing your collateral at a discount to cover it. I've seen this go wrong for countless users—a common mistake is trying to squeeze out that extra 0.5% APY by borrowing too close to the maximum LTV. This leaves virtually no room for market fluctuations.

Consider the UST collapse in May 2022: while not a direct recursive borrowing scenario, it highlighted the extreme risks of highly leveraged positions on volatile or unstable assets. Even with a blue-chip asset like ETH, a sudden, sharp market downturn—like when ETH dropped 40% in May 2022—can wipe out leveraged positions quickly. Ethereum gas fees, during peak congestion, can easily reach $50 or more for complex transactions, adding another layer of cost and making quick rebalances expensive or even unprofitable.

When Recursive Borrowing Works in Your Favor

On the flip side, when executed thoughtfully, recursive borrowing can be incredibly effective. Stable market conditions, a healthy spread between supply and borrow rates, and lucrative incentives create fertile ground for this strategy. For example, a 5% base yield on a deposited asset can potentially amplify into 12% or even 15% through careful looping.

A current major catalyst for this strategy is Arbitrum’s DRIP (DeFi Renaissance Incentive Program), launched November 1, 2025. This initiative actively encourages capital recycling by incentivizing users to borrow against assets on platforms such as Aave, Morpho, Fluid, Euler, Dolomite, and Silo within the Arbitrum ecosystem. Such programs can turn a marginally profitable loop into a highly attractive one, compensating for borrow costs and friction. For instance, lending protocols like Spark Liquidity Layer, currently at $1.86B TVL, and NAVI Lending, at $0.19B TVL, have seen significant 24-hour TVL increases, indicating renewed interest in these types of leveraged strategies.

Real-World Examples

Example 1: Looping stETH on Aave V3

One of the most popular and efficient recursive borrowing strategies involves Lido Staked ETH (stETH) on Aave V3, especially utilizing Aave's E-Mode. stETH is designed to trade very closely to ETH (it’s a liquid staking derivative), making it a strong candidate for E-Mode, which allows for significantly higher LTVs (sometimes over 90%) for highly correlated assets.

• Scenario: You have 10 stETH (worth, say, $30,000, assuming ETH at $3,000). You want to amplify your staking yield.
• Step 1: Deposit 10 stETH into Aave V3. You immediately start earning the stETH staking yield (from Lido) plus Aave's supply APY on stETH.
• Step 2: With E-Mode enabled, you might be able to borrow up to 90% LTV against your stETH. So, you borrow 9 ETH (worth $27,000).
• Step 3: You immediately swap this 9 ETH for 9 stETH (minus a small slippage fee on Curve or Uniswap).
• Step 4: You then deposit this new 9 stETH back into Aave V3 as additional collateral.
• Repeat: You can repeat this process several times, with each loop increasing your total supplied stETH. After three loops, your initial 10 stETH might effectively be generating yield on 25-30 stETH (though you're paying borrow interest on the additional 15-20 ETH).

This strategy amplifies your exposure to the underlying stETH yield. The key is to monitor the health factor closely, as even a minor de-peg of stETH from ETH or a sharp drop in ETH price could lead to liquidation.

Example 2: USDC Looping on Compound

Another recursive borrowing strategy involves stablecoins, often used to farm governance tokens or arbitrage stablecoin interest rates. While less about amplifying underlying asset yield (as stablecoins don't have a native staking yield like stETH), it's about amplifying exposure to yield incentives or a spread between supply/borrow rates.

• Scenario: You have $10,000 USDC and want to earn Compound (COMP) token rewards or a higher net stablecoin yield.
• Step 1: Deposit $10,000 USDC into Compound. You start earning the USDC supply APY and any COMP distribution for suppliers.
• Step 2: Assuming an 80% LTV, you borrow $8,000 USDC against your $10,000 collateral. You'll now pay the USDC borrow APY, but also potentially earn COMP distribution for borrowers.
• Step 3: You then deposit the $8,000 USDC back into Compound as new collateral.
• Repeat: Repeat this loop. Your total supplied USDC could reach, say, $40,000, with $30,000 borrowed. You're now earning supply APY and COMP on $40,000, while paying borrow APY and earning COMP on $30,000.

The net profitability here depends heavily on the COMP rewards, the spread between USDC supply and borrow rates, and any transaction costs. This strategy generally carries lower price risk than looping volatile assets, but borrow rates can still spike, making the position unprofitable if not managed.

Related Terms You Should Know

• Loan-to-Value (LTV): This is the maximum percentage of your collateral's value that you're permitted to borrow. For instance, an 80% LTV means you can borrow up to $80 for every $100 of collateral. Managing your LTV is critical to avoiding liquidation.
• Health Factor: Your health factor is a direct indicator of the safety of your borrowed position. It's a ratio that represents how far you are from liquidation; below 1.0 means you're eligible to be liquidated. We've published a detailed DeFi Lending Guide that covers the importance of maintaining a healthy factor in depth.
• Liquidation: This is the forced sale of your collateral by a liquidator (another smart contract user) to repay a portion of your outstanding loan when your health factor drops below 1.0. Liquidations always incur a penalty, making them expensive. You can use a Liquidation Price Calculator to understand your specific thresholds.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's a good recursive borrowing strategy to aim for?

A good strategy focuses on maintaining a high health factor, ideally above 1.5, and selecting stable, well-established assets with a clear positive spread between supply and borrow APYs. Leveraging additional incentives, like those from Arbitrum's DRIP program, can also make a strategy more robust. Always prioritize capital preservation over maximizing every last percentage point of yield.

How do I check my recursive borrowing position?

You can check your position directly on the protocol's dashboard (e.g., Aave or Compound). For a consolidated view across multiple protocols and chains, I recommend using portfolio trackers like DefiLlama, Debank, or Zapper. Our Aave Position Simulator also helps you model changes before you make them, and you can calculate your current safety with our Health Factor Calculator.

Can recursive borrowing APY change over time?

Absolutely, and often rapidly. APYs are highly dynamic in DeFi, influenced by market demand for borrowing and supplying, protocol utilization, and changes in liquidity mining incentives. External factors like overall market sentiment and gas fees can also impact your net returns. Consistent monitoring is crucial.

What are "Friction Costs" in recursive borrowing?

Friction costs primarily refer to the transaction fees (gas) you pay on the blockchain to execute each deposit, borrow, and potential swap operation within your loop. They also include any slippage incurred if you're swapping assets (like ETH to stETH) multiple times. These costs can significantly eat into your profits, especially on congested networks or with small capital, highlighting why efficiency and strategic timing are key.

Tools to Help You

• Aave Position Simulator: Model different recursive borrowing scenarios on Aave before you commit capital.
• Health Factor Calculator: Understand your current safety margin and how close you are to liquidation.
• Liquidation Price Calculator: Determine the exact price point at which your collateral will be liquidated.
• Borrowing Power Calculator: See how much you can safely borrow against your collateral, optimizing your loop depth.

---

Disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. DeFi protocols carry inherent risks including smart contract vulnerabilities, market volatility, and potential loss of funds. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.

Ready to put this knowledge into action? Try our Aave Position Simulator to simulate your positions and optimize your DeFi strategy risk-free.