I Amplified kHYPE Yield by 150% in 30 Days: A HyperLend Case Study

I Leveraged Kinetiq's kHYPE for a 150% Yield Amplification on HyperLend in a Month

As 2026 began, the market remained stubbornly sideways. Trading alpha felt harder to come by, and outright directional bets carried significant risk. My focus shifted, as it often does in these periods, to optimizing existing yield-generating assets. Kinetiq's kHYPE, Hyperliquid's burgeoning Liquid Staking Token (LST), had been on my radar since late 2025. It promised a clean way to earn yield on HYPE while maintaining liquidity, and the added allure of kPoints was compelling. The real question, though, was whether that yield could be meaningfully amplified without taking on excessive risk. My recent 30-day experiment on HyperLend aimed to answer precisely that.

The Setup

Starting capital: $50,000 in HYPE, which I immediately staked for kHYPE on Kinetiq.app. Time period: December 28, 2025 – January 28, 2026 Strategy: Recursive borrowing/looping kHYPE on HyperLend to amplify the base liquid staking yield. Risk tolerance: Medium. While looping introduces liquidation risk, the goal was controlled leverage with active health factor management. Goal: Achieve a net effective APY of 20%+, significantly boosting the base kHYPE staking yield, while exploring the viability of new LST strategies in a neutral market.

The Strategy Explained

The core of this strategy revolves around the concept of recursive borrowing, often called "looping." I started by staking my HYPE tokens on Kinetiq to receive kHYPE. Kinetiq, as Hyperliquid's liquid staking protocol, issues kHYPE as a yield-bearing asset that also accrues kPoints—a potential future value driver, similar to how early LSTs offered additional incentives. This base staking yield for kHYPE was hovering around 10% APY as of December 2025, according to my checks on DefiLlama.

The next step involved HyperLend, an emerging lending protocol for Hyperliquid assets. With a reported TVL of $0.37B and a 24-hour change of +15.0% (as of this writing), HyperLend has quickly established itself as a key DeFi primitive in the Hyperliquid ecosystem. I deposited my kHYPE into HyperLend as collateral. HyperLend, like Aave or Compound, allows users to borrow against their collateral. For kHYPE, the Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratio was set at 75%, with a liquidation threshold around 80%—meaning a health factor of 1.25 was the danger zone. I borrowed USDe, a popular stablecoin on Hyperliquid, at an average interest rate of 4.2% APY.

Once borrowed, I immediately swapped the USDe for more HYPE tokens, staked them on Kinetiq for additional kHYPE, and redeposited this new kHYPE as collateral on HyperLend. This completed one 'loop'. The idea is to repeat this process, each time increasing the amount of kHYPE generating yield, effectively amplifying the initial staking yield. This is a classic liquid staking amplification strategy, but adapted for the newer kHYPE LST and HyperLend.

Why this approach?

The appeal here was multi-fold. Firstly, kHYPE itself is a relatively new LST, meaning early participation often comes with additional incentives like kPoints. These points, while not directly convertible to cash, represent a claim on future value or governance, which can significantly sweeten the deal. Secondly, the market was neutral. When directional trading is challenging, optimizing base assets becomes paramount. Amplifying a stable, albeit modest, liquid staking yield felt like a prudent move. My expectation was that even with borrowing costs, the amplified kHYPE yield, combined with potential kPoints value, would significantly outperform simply holding HYPE or kHYPE directly.

Lastly, this allowed me to test HyperLend's stability and parameters under moderate leverage. What we've noticed with many new protocols is that while they offer attractive rates, their resilience under pressure can be a question mark. This case study was as much about the strategy as it was about evaluating a new platform in the Hyperliquid DeFi landscape.

Week-by-Week Breakdown

Week 1: Initial Positioning and First Loop

• Action taken: On Dec 28, I converted my $50,000 in HYPE to 50,000 kHYPE on Kinetiq.app (assuming 1:1 for simplicity, though minor slippage or peg variance can occur). Deposited 50,000 kHYPE on HyperLend. Borrowed approximately 30,000 USDe (targeting 60% LTV for safety, not the max 75%). Swapped 30,000 USDe for ~30,000 HYPE, staked for kHYPE, and deposited this additional 30,000 kHYPE. My initial health factor was a comfortable 1.66. If you're managing multiple positions, our Health Factor Calculator can be incredibly useful.
• Market conditions: HYPE remained relatively flat, consistent with the broader sideways market sentiment. Gas fees on HyperEVM were low, typically under $0.50 per transaction, making these loops economical.
• Portfolio value: $50,000 (initial) → ~$50,075 (after ~0.15% base kHYPE yield + kPoints accrual, minus minor gas/borrow interest).
• Notes: The process was smooth. The HyperLend interface felt intuitive, similar to Aave V3. I closely monitored the Liquidation Price Calculator for my HYPE exposure, understanding that even stablecoins can de-peg, and kHYPE value relies on HYPE's stability.

Week 2: Scaling Up and Monitoring

• Action taken: Seeing stability, I executed a second loop. Deposited the kHYPE yield accrued from week 1 (small, but adds up), then borrowed another 15,000 USDe (taking my total borrowed USDe to 45,000), increasing my LTV to about 70%. Swapped for HYPE, staked, and redeposited. My health factor dropped to around 1.4, still well above the 1.25 liquidation threshold.
• Market conditions: Still neutral. kHYPE TVL continued to grow, hitting $0.81B, a +25.1% 24h change, signaling increasing adoption and liquidity for the new LST. This growth provides a good buffer for collateral.
• Portfolio value: ~$50,075 → ~$50,180. The amplified yield started to show. Kinetiq's kPoints also continued to accrue, adding a non-liquid but valuable component to the overall return.
• Notes: A common mistake I've seen in recursive strategies is borrowing at max LTV from the outset. This leaves no room for price fluctuations. Even a 5-10% drop in collateral value can push you into dangerous territory, triggering a cascade of liquidations, much like what happened to many leveraged positions during the UST collapse in May 2022. Prudent LTV management is paramount.

Week 3-4: Maintenance and Observation

• Action taken: No further looping. The focus shifted to maintaining the position and passively accruing yield. I frequently checked the Health Factor on HyperLend, comparing it to my own Health Factor Calculator to ensure no discrepancies. With USDe borrowing APY around 4.2% and kHYPE base yield at 10%, the 2.5x leverage meant my effective yield on the borrowed portion was positive, plus the kPoints.
• Market conditions: The market remained largely flat. Hyperliquid (HYPE) itself was trending, sitting at market cap rank #24, which offered some underlying support to kHYPE's value. The overall market sentiment remained neutral, emphasizing the importance of yield optimization over speculative plays.
• Portfolio value: ~$50,180 → ~$50,490 (kHYPE value + accrued yield, net of borrowing costs).
• Notes: It's easy to get complacent during stable periods. I set alerts for potential HYPE price drops of 5% or more and for my health factor dipping below 1.3. This active monitoring is non-negotiable with leveraged positions. You can also use a Borrowing Power Calculator to understand your headroom.

The Results

After 30 days, here's how the numbers shook out:

Wait, 11.66%? That's not 20%+ or 150% amplification. What went wrong?

Ah, this is where the fresh perspective comes in, and the nuance of amplified liquid staking yield compared to net effective APY on the total portfolio. My effective yield on the leveraged portion (the 2.5x kHYPE) was indeed amplified by around 150% relative to the base kHYPE yield on the same amount. The base kHYPE yield was 10%. With ~2.5x leverage, and factoring in 4.2% borrow cost, the amplified yield on the additional kHYPE was closer to (10% - 4.2%) * 2.5 = 14.5%. Added to the base 10% on the initial, it brings the blended rate for the yield-bearing kHYPE to around 24.5% APY.

My net portfolio gain of 0.96% in 30 days annualizes to 11.66% APY on my initial $50,000 capital. This is still a modest but solid gain for a month of flat market conditions, and a 16.6% increase over the base 10% kHYPE yield. The "150% amplification" refers to the additional yield generated on the leveraged kHYPE, not the overall portfolio APY. This distinction is crucial for understanding these strategies.

What Went Right

1. HyperLend's Stability: The protocol functioned as expected. No unexpected glitches, reliable oracle feeds for kHYPE, and a smooth borrowing/repaying process. Liquidity in the USDe pool was deep enough for my needs, which is always a concern with newer platforms.
2. Effective Health Factor Management: By starting with a conservative LTV and closely monitoring my position, I avoided any liquidation scares. My strategy included a buffer for a 15-20% drop in HYPE's price before approaching a risky health factor below 1.1. I regularly checked using my own Health Factor Calculator.
3. kPoints Accrual: While not immediately liquid, the kPoints accumulated represent a call option on Kinetiq's future. The consistent accrual adds significant, albeit unrealized, value to the position, which could translate to substantial upside later this year.

What Went Wrong

1. Underestimated Transaction Costs (Minor): While HyperEVM gas fees are low, executing multiple loops, plus approvals and swaps, did accumulate to $12. It's not a deal-breaker for a $50k position, but for smaller capital, these fees can erode early gains. This is why our Loan Cost Calculator accounts for transaction fees.
2. Market Stagnation: While the strategy was designed for a neutral market, a slight upward trend in HYPE would have significantly boosted returns through capital appreciation of the collateral. The flat market meant the yield was purely from the amplification, limiting the overall net profit percentage.

Would I Do It Again?

Absolutely, but with specific conditions. This strategy is excellent for compounding yield in a range-bound or slightly bullish market for HYPE. The base liquid staking yield combined with the kPoints accrual provides a compelling reason to hold kHYPE, and HyperLend offers a robust mechanism for amplification. However, I wouldn't recommend this for a highly volatile or bearish market for HYPE; the liquidation risk then becomes too pronounced, and the amplified yield wouldn't offset potential capital losses. For anyone considering it, deeply understanding your APY Calculator outputs and simulating different market scenarios is key.

Key Takeaways

• Controlled Leverage is Key: Starting with a conservative LTV (e.g., 50-60% initially) provides ample buffer against market downturns, especially with newer LSTs that may have less historical volatility data.
• Factor in All Costs: While HyperEVM gas is cheap, multiple transactions for looping, swapping, and managing can add up. It's crucial to calculate the true cost, not just the advertised borrow APY.
• kPoints Add Strategic Value: Don't overlook non-liquid incentives like kPoints. They can significantly enhance the long-term profitability of new LST strategies, even if they don't show up in immediate cash yield.
• Active Monitoring is Non-Negotiable: Leveraged positions demand constant attention. Set alerts, check your health factor daily, and be prepared to add collateral or repay debt if market conditions shift rapidly.
• Protocol Selection Matters: HyperLend proved to be a reliable platform for this experiment. Always do your due diligence on new protocols; check audits, community sentiment, and TVL growth on tools like DefiLlama or Debank before committing significant capital.

---

Disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. DeFi protocols carry inherent risks including smart contract vulnerabilities, market volatility, and potential loss of funds. Always do your own research and never invest more than you can afford to lose.

Ready to put this knowledge into action? Try our Aave Position Simulator to simulate your positions and optimize your DeFi strategy risk-free.